12个愤怒的人-群体动力学视角
有时，仅仅通过阅读书籍或案例研究是无法理解群体动力学的。只有亲眼看到或亲身经历，才能更好地学习或理解它。大多数MBA学生在进入自己选择的商学院之前都经历了GD过程，因此他们对群体动态如何导致不同的结果有一定的了解。
《怒汉》就是这样一部电影，它展示了群体动力是如何导致成功或失败的《愤怒的男人》是1957年上映的经典电影。在这部电影中，12个人被关在一个房间里讨论一个案件，并做出最终决定。在他们没有做出最终决定之前，任何人都不允许离开。
与典型的GD会话非常相似。群体动力学与群体的结构和功能以及每个个体所扮演的不同类型的角色有关。在这部电影中，12个人被聚集在一个房间里，决定一个男孩是否犯有杀害他父亲的罪行。
在整部电影中，每个成员都被精心打造。他在团队动态中被赋予了适当的角色。从10号陪审员的偏执到4号陪审员的冷漠分析，这部电影展现了人性的方方面面。无论他们给陪审团带来的是好是坏的品质，他们都影响了结果。
电影一开始就震撼了观众。没有讨论，11名成员投票认为被告有罪，并试图离开房间。实际上，没有人会费心去想他们的决定对个人意味着什么。一个人固执己见，不肯改变，另一个人只想去看棒球比赛，不关心被告的下场。当一个团队变得过于自信，无法现实地思考自己的任务时，就会出现群体思维。由于在群体中沟通和达成共识需要更长的时间，所以在群体中做决策是耗时的。但是陪审员没有。8号不会成为群体思维错误的牺牲品，而是站在群体的对立面。在这之后，电影非常激烈。陪审员不。 8 agrees that he is unsure whether the accused is guilty or not but he wants some discussion on the case. From here on the movie not only presents the discussion but also reveals the type of each individual in detail.
陪审员不。他试图以领导(或领班)的身份推行秩序。他扮演着“领导者”的角色，一个单纯的人，他显然不明白摆在他面前的任务的复杂性，但却试图尽一切努力不让别人发现这一点。在影片中，他只有一次表现得自在——当他谈到足球的时候。他不幸被选为陪审团主席——他显然不喜欢这个任务。陪审员不。他个子矮小，文静，显然不习惯发表自己的意见，更不指望自己的意见有什么重要意义。作为温顺的“观察者”和温顺的“信息提供者”，二号人物显然在他的工作中找到了安慰——他是一名会计。陪审员不。3可能是影片中最复杂的人格。 He starts off like a pleasant self-made successful businessman, analyzing the case impartially, explaining the arguments well and is reasonably self-assured. As time goes on he becomes more and more passionate exploding in disbelieving anger and seems somehow to be personally involved with the case. His motivation for behaving as he does is revealed when he discloses that he’s not on good terms with his own son. Illusions to his animosity toward youth were made when he says that kids today have no respect and that he has not see his son in over a decade. No.3 namely plays the “aggressive”, “dominator” and “blocker” roles. His personal baggage with his own son “blocked” or prolonged the decision-making. Yet this overbearing, angry and sadistic man finally deserved our sorrow. Juror no.4 is a self -assured, slightly arrogant stockbroker.
他显然认为自己比房间里的任何人都聪明，他以冷静无情的逻辑来处理案件，但他没有考虑到案件中涉及的人的感情、激情和性格。4号扮演了一个冷酷的、善于分析的“信息提供者”的角色。他列举了案件中的事实，就像从报纸上读到股票收盘价格一样。他那勤奋而又永远严厉的目光使那些不同意他的人黯然神伤。陪审员不。他是一个承受巨大情感压力的人。他和被指控的男孩有着相同的社会背景——他几乎不情愿地认同了这个男孩。矛盾的是，这似乎是他投票有罪的主要原因之一——他不想让同情影响他——具有讽刺意味的是，它确实影响了他。5号代表“情绪化”，表现出强烈的防御性。陪审员不。6 is a simple man, quite readily admitting that everyone in the room is better qualified than he is to make decisions and offer explanations. But he really wants to see justice done and it worries him that he might make a mistake. Agreeing with everyone and talking even less, No. 6’s role is the “silent” and “conformist.” Juror no.7 is the only one who really has no opinion on the case – he talks of baseball. Of the heat, of fixing the fan but the only reason he has for voting this way or that is to speed things up a bit so he might be out of the jury room as soon as possible. Not an evil man he just has no sense of morality whatsoever – he can tell right from wrong but does not seem to think its worth the bother. Failing to take the group seriously, No. 7 falls into the “playboy” and “bored one” roles. Juror no.8 is a caring man who has put more thought into the case than any of the other jurors. He tries to do his best in the face of seemingly impossible odds. Both confident and nervous, as well as being under intense and hostile scrutiny, No. 8 states that he couldn't vote in that way for one simple reason; there is reasonable doubt in his mind. No. 8 acts as “model person” and “nonconformist.” Juror no.9 is a wise old man. With his great life experience he has quite a unique way of looking at the case.
陪审员没有。8他拒绝不经讨论就走，他被同伴嘲笑，被迫改变他的决定，但他没有动。他说，他们都将进行第二轮投票，他将不参加投票。如果其他11人都认为有罪，他也会投同样的票，案件就可以结案了。但这次9号陪审员加入了他现在变成了2对10。所以现在大家都得坐下来讨论这个案子。陪审员不。10是电影中最恐怖的角色。他认为有罪，甚至没有试图隐瞒事实，他这样做只是因为男孩的社会背景。悲剧的根源在于，他自己的社会地位只比男孩高一截——这使得他更加急于强调这种差异。10号令人厌恶和有毒的偏执使他在整部电影中扮演着“进攻者”、“揭穿者”和“拦路虎”的角色。陪审员不。11, an immigrant watchmaker, is a careful analytical man, well mannered and soft spoken. He respects the right of people to have different opinions to his – and is willing to look at both sides of the problem. He loses his temper only once – horrified by the complete indifference of Juror No. 7. His role is that of “group observer” as well as “opinion giver.”
陪审员不。12是一个年轻的商人类型——也许他有自己的观点——但小心地隐藏它们。他从生活中学到的似乎是，智慧等同于同意大多数人的想法。12号从事广告和观点方面的工作，担任陪审团并不比创作洗衣皂广告歌更认真。他是一个能说会道但容易动摇的年轻“傻瓜”，扮演着“墨守成规”的角色。
电影向前推进，渐渐地所有成员开始支持陪审员no。最后所有陪审员都投票认为被告无罪。
这部电影非常紧张，陪审员8号说服了所有人，让案件有一个合乎逻辑的结局。故事也很棒，这为电影中的群体动力提供了最好的背景。突然的转折也让观众一直好奇到最后。
注:如果你是一名印度MBA学生，你还可以观看《Ek ruka hua faisla》，这是根据《12个愤怒的人》改编的印度电影。它的特点是非常好的演员，如Pankaj Kapoor,Anu Kapoor和其他许多人。这个故事是根据印度问题和相关性改编的。你可以看任何一个，也可以两个都看。当你看电影的时候只要追踪电影过程中发生的各种群体动态。
beplay体育·(中国)官方入口Mbaskool.com强烈推荐《12怒汉》(或《1 ruka hua faisla》)。
